This HTML5 document contains 37 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n20https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112790/martin-v-district-of-columbia-court-of-appeals/
dcthttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n11http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Martin_v._District_of_Columbia_Court_of_Appeals&action=
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
dbpedia-wikidatahttp://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/
n2http://dbpedia.org/resource/Martin_v.
n16http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Martin_v._District_of_Columbia_Court_of_Appeals&oldid=
n22https://www.oyez.org/cases/1992/
n12http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_v.
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
n21https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/506/1/case.
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n10https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/506/1.
n14http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n5http://wikidata.org/entity/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n19https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n9http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep506/usrep506001/usrep506001.
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
Subject Item
n2:_District_of_Columbia_Court_of_Appeals
rdf:type
dbo:LegalCase dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:UnitOfWork owl:Thing wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:Case
owl:sameAs
n5:Q17075101 n14:0w6094q dbpedia-wikidata:Q17075101
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
n12:_District_of_Columbia_Court_of_Appeals
rdfs:comment
Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992), was a Supreme Court opinion denying a petition for motion to proceed in forma pauperis, as the petitioner had repeatedly abused the process. Specifically, the Court prohibited the petitioner from filing further non-criminal in forma pauperis petitions, and that all petitions filed must be compliant with Court rules and must have had the filing fee paid. The dissent, written by Justice Stevens, argued that the result violated the "open access" of the Court.
rdfs:label
Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
dbo:abstract
Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992), was a Supreme Court opinion denying a petition for motion to proceed in forma pauperis, as the petitioner had repeatedly abused the process. Specifically, the Court prohibited the petitioner from filing further non-criminal in forma pauperis petitions, and that all petitions filed must be compliant with Court rules and must have had the filing fee paid. The dissent, written by Justice Stevens, argued that the result violated the "open access" of the Court.
dbo:wikiPageEditLink
n11:edit
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n9:pdf n10:html n19:12836123124631598508 n20: n21:html n22:92-5584
dbo:wikiPageExtracted
2019-06-13T18:18:38Z
dbo:wikiPageHistoryLink
n11:history
dbo:wikiPageID
39821464
dbo:wikiPageLength
2301
dbo:wikiPageModified
2019-06-10T16:15:00Z
dbo:wikiPageOutDegree
10
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
901244695
dbo:wikiPageRevisionLink
n16:901244695
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:SCOTUS-stub
dct:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Subject Item
n12:_District_of_Columbia_Court_of_Appeals
foaf:primaryTopic
n2:_District_of_Columbia_Court_of_Appeals