Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case about the procedures determining when prison litigation may be commenced in federal court. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that prisoners must exhaust all state-court remedies in accordance with the rules thereof before filing claims in federal court. Justice Stephen Breyer filed a concurrence. Justice John Paul Stevens filed a dissent.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case about the procedures determining when prison litigation may be commenced in federal court. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that prisoners must exhaust all state-court remedies in accordance with the rules thereof before filing claims in federal court. Justice Stephen Breyer filed a concurrence. Justice John Paul Stevens filed a dissent. (en)
dbo:wikiPageEditLink
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageExtracted
  • 2019-06-20 15:02:54Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageHistoryLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 8202403 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6252 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageModified
  • 2019-05-07 06:32:26Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageOutDegree
  • 28 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 895905390 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionLink
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case about the procedures determining when prison litigation may be commenced in federal court. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that prisoners must exhaust all state-court remedies in accordance with the rules thereof before filing claims in federal court. Justice Stephen Breyer filed a concurrence. Justice John Paul Stevens filed a dissent. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Woodford v. Ngo (en)
owl:sameAs
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • Jeanne S. Woodford, et al., Petitioners v. Viet Mike Ngo (en)
  • (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is foaf:primaryTopic of