| Property |
Value |
| dbo:abstract
|
- Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942), was the United States Supreme Court ruling that held that laws permitting the compulsory sterilization of criminals are unconstitutional if the sterilization law treats similar crimes differently. The relevant Oklahoma law applied to "habitual criminals," but the law excluded white-collar crimes from carrying sterilization penalties. The Court held that treating similar crimes differently violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. (en)
- Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942), was the United States Supreme Court ruling that held that laws permitting the compulsory sterilization of criminals are unconstitutional as it violates a persons rights given under the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, specifically the Equal Protection Clause, as well as the Due Process Clause. The relevant Oklahoma law applied to "habitual criminals," but the law excluded white-collar crimes from carrying sterilization penalties. (en)
- Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942), was the United States Supreme Court ruling that held that laws permitting the compulsory sterilization of criminals are unconstitutional as it violates a person's rights given under the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, specifically the Equal Protection Clause, as well as the Due Process Clause. The relevant Oklahoma law applied to "habitual criminals," but the law excluded white-collar crimes from carrying sterilization penalties. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageEditLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExtracted
|
- 2019-12-10 13:32:21Z (xsd:date)
- 2020-11-26 04:25:04Z (xsd:date)
- 2020-11-26 04:28:28Z (xsd:date)
- 2020-12-05 10:58:43Z (xsd:date)
- 2020-12-15 06:42:02Z (xsd:date)
- 2021-03-17 23:50:49Z (xsd:date)
- 2021-04-07 17:00:35Z (xsd:date)
|
| dbo:wikiPageHistoryLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 12472 (xsd:integer)
- 12839 (xsd:integer)
- 12879 (xsd:integer)
- 12894 (xsd:integer)
- 12901 (xsd:integer)
- 12902 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbo:wikiPageModified
|
- 2019-12-10 13:32:17Z (xsd:date)
- 2020-11-26 04:24:58Z (xsd:date)
- 2020-11-26 04:28:24Z (xsd:date)
- 2020-12-05 10:58:40Z (xsd:date)
- 2020-12-15 06:41:57Z (xsd:date)
- 2021-03-17 23:50:42Z (xsd:date)
- 2021-04-07 17:00:30Z (xsd:date)
|
| dbo:wikiPageOutDegree
|
- 49 (xsd:integer)
- 50 (xsd:integer)
- 54 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
|
- 930135036 (xsd:integer)
- 990725508 (xsd:integer)
- 990725810 (xsd:integer)
- 992458727 (xsd:integer)
- 994346859 (xsd:integer)
- 1012725197 (xsd:integer)
- 1016525710 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionLink
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942), was the United States Supreme Court ruling that held that laws permitting the compulsory sterilization of criminals are unconstitutional if the sterilization law treats similar crimes differently. The relevant Oklahoma law applied to "habitual criminals," but the law excluded white-collar crimes from carrying sterilization penalties. The Court held that treating similar crimes differently violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. (en)
- Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942), was the United States Supreme Court ruling that held that laws permitting the compulsory sterilization of criminals are unconstitutional as it violates a persons rights given under the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, specifically the Equal Protection Clause, as well as the Due Process Clause. The relevant Oklahoma law applied to "habitual criminals," but the law excluded white-collar crimes from carrying sterilization penalties. (en)
- Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942), was the United States Supreme Court ruling that held that laws permitting the compulsory sterilization of criminals are unconstitutional as it violates a person's rights given under the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, specifically the Equal Protection Clause, as well as the Due Process Clause. The relevant Oklahoma law applied to "habitual criminals," but the law excluded white-collar crimes from carrying sterilization penalties. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, ex. rel. Williamson, Atty. Gen. of Oklahoma (en)
- (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
