Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 230 F.3d 868 (6th Cir. 2000), was a case decided by the 6th Circuit that held that remand to a state court cannot be achieved after removal to a federal court by lowering the damages sought to fall below the amount in controversy requirement.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 230 F.3d 868 (6th Cir. 2000), was a case decided by the 6th Circuit that held that remand to a state court cannot be achieved after removal to a federal court by lowering the damages sought to fall below the amount in controversy requirement. (en)
dbo:wikiPageEditLink
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageExtracted
  • 2019-06-15 21:59:37Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-14 16:54:34Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageHistoryLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 25445850 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 3234 (xsd:integer)
  • 3236 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageModified
  • 2018-06-27 20:45:07Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-14 16:54:29Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageOutDegree
  • 23 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 847795992 (xsd:integer)
  • 1000320467 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionLink
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 230 F.3d 868 (6th Cir. 2000), was a case decided by the 6th Circuit that held that remand to a state court cannot be achieved after removal to a federal court by lowering the damages sought to fall below the amount in controversy requirement. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is foaf:primaryTopic of