Oregon v. Guzek, 546 U.S. 517 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which ruled that the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not grant criminal defendants facing the death penalty the right to introduce new evidence of their innocence during sentencing that was not introduced during trial. Accordingly, states could constitutionally exclude such evidence from the sentencing phase of a capital trial.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Oregon v. Guzek, 546 U.S. 517 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which ruled that the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not grant criminal defendants facing the death penalty the right to introduce new evidence of their innocence during sentencing that was not introduced during trial. Accordingly, states could constitutionally exclude such evidence from the sentencing phase of a capital trial. (en)
dbo:wikiPageEditLink
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageExtracted
  • 2019-06-14 20:04:47Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageHistoryLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 3897149 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 7673 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageModified
  • 2019-06-02 11:02:48Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageOutDegree
  • 36 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 899939211 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionLink
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Oregon v. Guzek, 546 U.S. 517 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which ruled that the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not grant criminal defendants facing the death penalty the right to introduce new evidence of their innocence during sentencing that was not introduced during trial. Accordingly, states could constitutionally exclude such evidence from the sentencing phase of a capital trial. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Oregon v. Guzek (en)
owl:sameAs
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • Oregon, Petitioner v. Randy Lee Guzek (en)
  • (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is foaf:primaryTopic of