Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248 (1993), is the second in the trilogy of United States Supreme Court ERISA preemption cases that effectively denies any remedy for employees who are harmed by medical malpractice or other bad acts of their health plan if they receive their health care from their employer.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248 (1993), is the second in the trilogy of United States Supreme Court ERISA preemption cases that effectively denies any remedy for employees who are harmed by medical malpractice or other bad acts of their health plan if they receive their health care from their employer. (en)
dbo:wikiPageEditLink
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageExtracted
  • 2019-06-13 22:17:21Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-08-01 05:20:09Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageHistoryLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 7110775 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6336 (xsd:integer)
  • 6344 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageModified
  • 2019-05-07 05:46:23Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-08-01 05:20:04Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageOutDegree
  • 36 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 895900309 (xsd:integer)
  • 970582854 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionLink
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248 (1993), is the second in the trilogy of United States Supreme Court ERISA preemption cases that effectively denies any remedy for employees who are harmed by medical malpractice or other bad acts of their health plan if they receive their health care from their employer. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Mertens v. Hewitt Associates (en)
owl:sameAs
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • William J. Mertens, Alex W. Bandrowski, James A. Clark, and Russell Franz, Petitioners v. Hewitt Associates (en)
  • (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is foaf:primaryTopic of