Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1 (1972), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court dismissed for lack of ripeness a claim in which the plaintiff accused the U.S. Army of alleged unlawful "surveillance of lawful citizen political activity." The appellant's specific nature of the harm caused by the surveillance was that it chilled the First Amendment rights of all citizens and undermined that right to express political dissent.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1 (1972), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court dismissed for lack of ripeness a claim in which the plaintiff accused the U.S. Army of alleged unlawful "surveillance of lawful citizen political activity." The appellant's specific nature of the harm caused by the surveillance was that it chilled the First Amendment rights of all citizens and undermined that right to express political dissent. (en)
dbo:wikiPageEditLink
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageExtracted
  • 2019-09-07 14:32:29Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-11-24 19:43:02Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-11-28 09:26:55Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-04-10 18:09:47Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageHistoryLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 2141536 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 8794 (xsd:integer)
  • 8811 (xsd:integer)
  • 8864 (xsd:integer)
  • 8875 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageModified
  • 2019-09-07 14:32:20Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-11-24 19:42:57Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-11-28 09:26:50Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-04-10 18:09:32Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageOutDegree
  • 32 (xsd:integer)
  • 33 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 914446167 (xsd:integer)
  • 990490444 (xsd:integer)
  • 991111738 (xsd:integer)
  • 1017081955 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionLink
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1 (1972), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court dismissed for lack of ripeness a claim in which the plaintiff accused the U.S. Army of alleged unlawful "surveillance of lawful citizen political activity." The appellant's specific nature of the harm caused by the surveillance was that it chilled the First Amendment rights of all citizens and undermined that right to express political dissent. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Laird v. Tatum (en)
owl:sameAs
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • Melvin Robert Laird, Secretary of Defense, et al. v. Tatum, et al. (en)
  • (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is foaf:primaryTopic of