Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. ___ (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court answered whether an American court may exercise jurisdiction over a foreign company based on the fact that a subsidiary of the company acts on its behalf in the jurisdictional state. The court held that an American company cannot be sued for conduct occurring outside the United States and American courts do not have jurisdiction of such a claim.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. ___ (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court answered whether an American court may exercise jurisdiction over a foreign company based on the fact that a subsidiary of the company acts on its behalf in the jurisdictional state. The court held that an American company cannot be sued for conduct occurring outside the United States and American courts do not have jurisdiction of such a claim. (en)
  • Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court answered whether an American court may exercise jurisdiction over a foreign company based on the fact that a subsidiary of the company acts on its behalf in the jurisdictional state. The court held that an American company cannot be sued for conduct occurring outside the United States and American courts do not have jurisdiction of such a claim. (en)
dbo:wikiPageEditLink
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageExtracted
  • 2019-11-19 21:59:40Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-10-12 12:40:35Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-10-13 15:47:39Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-10-13 15:48:57Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-11-07 01:11:01Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-24 22:14:41Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-24 22:16:30Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-24 23:34:44Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-24 23:35:14Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-24 23:36:41Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-25 01:06:22Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-25 01:10:32Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-25 01:11:29Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-25 01:13:06Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageHistoryLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 43453753 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 15241 (xsd:integer)
  • 15287 (xsd:integer)
  • 15326 (xsd:integer)
  • 15327 (xsd:integer)
  • 15334 (xsd:integer)
  • 15345 (xsd:integer)
  • 15347 (xsd:integer)
  • 15397 (xsd:integer)
  • 15406 (xsd:integer)
  • 15424 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageModified
  • 2019-11-19 21:59:38Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-10-12 12:40:31Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-10-13 15:47:34Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-10-13 15:48:54Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-11-07 01:10:57Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-24 22:14:34Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-24 22:16:22Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-24 23:34:40Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-24 23:35:10Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-24 23:36:37Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-25 01:06:20Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-25 01:10:29Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-25 01:11:24Z (xsd:date)
  • 2021-01-25 01:13:02Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageOutDegree
  • 49 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 927024646 (xsd:integer)
  • 983132160 (xsd:integer)
  • 983322932 (xsd:integer)
  • 983323157 (xsd:integer)
  • 987435493 (xsd:integer)
  • 1002533259 (xsd:integer)
  • 1002533583 (xsd:integer)
  • 1002545159 (xsd:integer)
  • 1002545250 (xsd:integer)
  • 1002545483 (xsd:integer)
  • 1002562356 (xsd:integer)
  • 1002563097 (xsd:integer)
  • 1002563270 (xsd:integer)
  • 1002563617 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionLink
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. ___ (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court answered whether an American court may exercise jurisdiction over a foreign company based on the fact that a subsidiary of the company acts on its behalf in the jurisdictional state. The court held that an American company cannot be sued for conduct occurring outside the United States and American courts do not have jurisdiction of such a claim. (en)
  • Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court answered whether an American court may exercise jurisdiction over a foreign company based on the fact that a subsidiary of the company acts on its behalf in the jurisdictional state. The court held that an American company cannot be sued for conduct occurring outside the United States and American courts do not have jurisdiction of such a claim. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Daimler AG v. Bauman (en)
owl:sameAs
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • DaimlerChrysler AG, Petitioner v. Barbara Bauman, et al. (en)
is foaf:primaryTopic of