Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), together with Commissioner v. Banaitis, was a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with the issue of whether the portion of a money judgment or settlement paid to a taxpayer's attorney under a contingent-fee agreement is income to the taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. The Supreme Court held when a taxpayer's recovery constitutes income, the taxpayer's income includes the portion of the recovery paid to the attorney as a contingent fee. Employment cases are an exception to this Supreme Court ruling because of the in the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The Civil Rights Tax Relief amended Internal Revenue Code § 62(a) to permit taxpayers to subtract attorney's fees from gross income in arriving at adjusted

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), together with Commissioner v. Banaitis, was a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with the issue of whether the portion of a money judgment or settlement paid to a taxpayer's attorney under a contingent-fee agreement is income to the taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. The Supreme Court held when a taxpayer's recovery constitutes income, the taxpayer's income includes the portion of the recovery paid to the attorney as a contingent fee. Employment cases are an exception to this Supreme Court ruling because of the in the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The Civil Rights Tax Relief amended Internal Revenue Code § 62(a) to permit taxpayers to subtract attorney's fees from gross income in arriving at adjusted gross income. (en)
dbo:wikiPageEditLink
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageExtracted
  • 2019-08-12 20:16:12Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-07-23 00:04:41Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageHistoryLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 14611546 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 10098 (xsd:integer)
  • 10123 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageModified
  • 2019-08-12 20:16:08Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-07-23 00:04:36Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageOutDegree
  • 31 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 910543751 (xsd:integer)
  • 969029324 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionLink
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), together with Commissioner v. Banaitis, was a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with the issue of whether the portion of a money judgment or settlement paid to a taxpayer's attorney under a contingent-fee agreement is income to the taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. The Supreme Court held when a taxpayer's recovery constitutes income, the taxpayer's income includes the portion of the recovery paid to the attorney as a contingent fee. Employment cases are an exception to this Supreme Court ruling because of the in the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The Civil Rights Tax Relief amended Internal Revenue Code § 62(a) to permit taxpayers to subtract attorney's fees from gross income in arriving at adjusted (en)
rdfs:label
  • Commissioner v. Banks (en)
owl:sameAs
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • v. (en)
  • Commissioner of Internal Revenue (en)
  • John W. Banks II (en)
  • Sigitas J. Banaitis (en)
  • (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is foaf:primaryTopic of