Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
  • Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. 305 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
dbo:wikiPageEditLink
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageExtracted
  • 2019-06-08 14:30:49Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 16:34:00Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 16:39:49Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 16:47:56Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 16:55:54Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 19:19:15Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 19:30:01Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 19:30:19Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-10 14:18:08Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-07-08 18:13:34Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-10-18 17:02:30Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-11-22 15:38:19Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-11-24 20:37:29Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-12-14 23:15:06Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageHistoryLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 47025662 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 5376 (xsd:integer)
  • 5392 (xsd:integer)
  • 6074 (xsd:integer)
  • 6085 (xsd:integer)
  • 6090 (xsd:integer)
  • 6093 (xsd:integer)
  • 6798 (xsd:integer)
  • 6821 (xsd:integer)
  • 6837 (xsd:integer)
  • 6842 (xsd:integer)
  • 6846 (xsd:integer)
  • 6974 (xsd:integer)
  • 6987 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageModified
  • 2019-05-07 05:02:36Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 16:33:57Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 16:39:45Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 16:47:52Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 16:55:52Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 19:19:10Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 19:29:59Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-06 19:30:16Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-06-10 14:18:04Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-07-08 18:13:31Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-10-18 17:02:25Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-11-22 15:38:13Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-11-24 20:37:24Z (xsd:date)
  • 2020-12-14 23:14:58Z (xsd:date)
dbo:wikiPageOutDegree
  • 26 (xsd:integer)
  • 27 (xsd:integer)
  • 28 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 895895569 (xsd:integer)
  • 961103786 (xsd:integer)
  • 961104619 (xsd:integer)
  • 961105859 (xsd:integer)
  • 961107068 (xsd:integer)
  • 961128857 (xsd:integer)
  • 961130431 (xsd:integer)
  • 961130479 (xsd:integer)
  • 961806215 (xsd:integer)
  • 966707953 (xsd:integer)
  • 984174770 (xsd:integer)
  • 990057882 (xsd:integer)
  • 990498296 (xsd:integer)
  • 994286482 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionLink
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
  • Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. 305 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Brumfield v. Cain (en)
owl:sameAs
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Kevan Brumfield v. Burl Cain, Warden (en)
is foaf:primaryTopic of